browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

Notes on tuning a Hustler 6BTV

Posted by on July 24, 2017

80 Meters, no choke, 8 radials.

80 Meters, no choke, 8 radials.


I thought I would share a few of my notes on tuning up a 6BTV, (review of the DX Engineering 17 meter add on kit here), antenna, and constructing a radial field.  I have been using a GAP Challenger DX, (review here), for the past fifteen years, unbeknownst to me, and over that time, water had been slowly seeping into the tuning harness of the antenna.

The harness finally gave up the ghost one day, presenting a dead short to my Solid State ALS-1306 amp, (review here), as I increased power.  At about 800 watts CW, the harness shorted out, killing the ALS-1306, and necessitating the amp make a trip back to ALS-1306 heaven, (Ameritron), to have a replacement RF output device installed.

Replacing the Challenger was one of the options on the table, but I did not want to do a new install of a Challenger– I remember the last install.  The entire phasing harness installation process is not fun, nor is it easy, so– given there were a few things about the Challenger I was not happy with anyway, I began looking for a different antenna.

A used 6BTV came up on the local market.  I knew the history of the antenna, and I had known the owner for decades, so I knew the antenna had not been abused.  I also knew that the antenna was less than a year old.  The price was right, so I purchased it.  It arrived at my QTH with a cracked trap cover for 10 Meters, (I assume this happened in transport), and with  lot of water dripping out of the 20 meter trap.   I ordered replacement trap covers from New-Tronics, and proceeded to replace all the trap covers once the new ones arrived.  Thankfully the previous owner had used Pentrox-A on all sliding parts, so the antenna came apart like butter.  I also noticed that one of the hose clamps used to tighten the 10 meter element was stripped, so I got a new one of those as well.  This pretty well took care of getting all the loose parts in one place in preparation for tuneup of the 6BTV.  You can click any image on this page and get the original in large format.

Information Gathering:

I am one of those people that likes to read all about a process before I start, so in my wanderings around the net I found out a few things about the 6BTV:

  • The factory configuration and spacing diagrams for tuning are for no radials.
  • DX Engineering has a wonderful install guide for the 6BTV which puts the manufacturer’s instruction guide to shame.
  • There are a lot of additional add ons DX Engineering sells for the antenna, all good.
  • I would need a radial field to realize better performance out of the antenna.
  • I was not happy with the manufacturer’s instructions to tune the antenna for the center of the band.  I do mostly CW, or data, so that would not do.

The first thing I discovered was that I wanted to do this by the book, and do it right, so I constructed a step by step process guide to do the install and tuneup.

Install Guide:

One of the first items was to decide where exactly to install the multiband antenna, and have it not affect other antenna, or be affected by other antenna.  I have plans for a four square on 30 Meters one day, so I decided to draw out the final configuration for a two element 40 Meter phased array, and a four square on 30 Meters.  I obtained a plat map from the county, and added the antenna and radial fields for all future antenna.  This helped me select the right location for the 6BTV.  It is the antenna just to the East of the tree in the backyard.  I also installed underground cable feeds, and a remote coax switch on the rear of the work shed, and then ran a single feedline to the house and the shack.

Next I constructed a step by step guide with all the steps I needed to take to get the 6BTV up and operational.

Install steps:

  1. Install support for antenna
  2. Install antenna
  3. Construct Radial Field
  4. Perform very rough tuneup on the antenna.
  5. Measure R value at base of the antenna.
  6. Add radials, and remeasure the R value.
  7. If R value makes no major change from the previous reading exit to step 8, else goto 6.
  8. Define the operating frequency for each band.
  9. Measure actual two to one SWR bandwidth for each band.
  10. Select the center of the two to one spread, and decide where to put it, so that I could operate in the lower parts of the band, and cover the data parts as well.
  11. Tune the antenna to put the center point for a two to one SWR at the correct location on the band to give me no less than one point five to one SWR at the bottom of all bands but 80 Meters.
  12. Put 80 Meters resonance point at around 3.800 MHz, so I can use the antenna on the phone portion of the 80 Meter band.
One down, six more to go...

One down, six more to go…

Install Antenna Support Structure:

The very first thing I did was to call in a locate for all pipes, and cables that might be under my yard.  This step absolves you of all liability if you hit something that you should not hit while digging.  I NEVER dig without a locate.

I next located where each hole needed to be, and then I marked each location with a red circle.  Also given that I had a large number of post holes to dig, I elected to use a powered post hole digger, which I rented from one of the local rental shops.  The thought of digging each each post hole with a hand held post hole digger was not appealing to me at all, and I am not sorry for the money it cost to rent the digger.

Total overview of antenna mount

Overview of antenna mount

I made each hole eight inches in diameter, by two feed deep.  After taking maybe two hours to dig all holes, I returned the post hole digger to the rental shop.  After policing up the dirt, and moving it to low spots in the field, I next dropped about an inch of gravel into each hole.  The gravel keeps water off of the concrete, or at least it is supposed too…

I next purchased a set of six pole levelers.  They are cheap, only a few bucks, and once you have the posts in the concrete, you want to quickly be able to see if the posts are vertical.  If not, you can tap them into place, prior to the concrete setting.  I also wanted a ground rod at each antenna site, so I again headed to the local rental store.  I rented a ground rod driver.  This is an impact driver and it takes about 10 minutes to drive in an eight foot ground rod into gravel and clay.  I have driven in ground rods before here, and that takes about an hour, six of these would take far longer as I would tire out.  I just rented the driver, and spent about an hour and drove them all in.

Antenna Install:

After allowing the concrete to cure for about a week, I installed the DX Engineering Radial Plate, and the DX Engineering Tilt plate for the antenna.  Next I bolted the antenna to the tilt plate, and connected the existing five radials from the old Challenger install to the radial plate.  I used eye rings, to do this, crimping each ring carefully as they would be out in the weather for years to come.

Radial Field:

The Challenger had no need of a radial field, save the three radials used as a counterpoise for 40 Meters.  So I repurposed the three radials, and added 5 more.  That gave me 8 radials, as 40 Meters was the lowest frequency band I had any real interest in, I made them all 1/4 wave long on 40.  The goal is to add as many radials as needed to see a very small change in R while I double the radial count.  When I see little change, or if I approach 36 ohms, I will stop, as the next doubling will do even less than the previous doubling did to reduce R.

40 Meters, no choke, 8 Radials

40 Meters, no choke, 8 Radials

Rough Tuneup:

Next I did a very rough check of the tuning of the antenna, making sure it was in the ham bands, I walked in each band using the AA-54 to check SWR, and as I got to each band, I just got the dip into the band, not at a particular location within the band.  That would come later.

As the radial field changes, the antenna tuning changes, so there is an interaction between the two.  I did not want to spend a few hours getting the antenna tuned to the exact spot in a band, only to have that tuning change as I added radials, or chokes.

Measure R at base of antenna:

Next I dropped into loop mode, measuring the R value then I adding radials, and measuring R again.  I ended up with 13 radials, and will probably make it 16 radials just because 16 is a power of 2, and numbers that are not bother me…  I started with 4 radials, measured R, then added 4 more, that dropped R, I added 8, and R dropped again, although not very much.  I added another 5 radials, (ran out of material), and measured R again, and saw almost no change…  So I concluded doubling again would not win me much lower R values, and called it done!  I am a bit surprised at how fw radials it took to get to this point, and I will be adding more as time goes on anyway, because I believe I will get a bit more performance, but not much beyond 32.

Define the operating frequency for each band:

Now that the radial field was mostly complete, I could actually begin the carefully tuning the antenna.  I first decided in each band where I wanted the low point to be for SWR.  I operate CW more than any other mode, so I wanted to skew all SWR readings to the low end of each band, save 80 Meters– I only do SSB on 80, so I wanted that to be on the high side of 80.  To do this I needed to decide what the bandwidth of the antenna was across my arbitrarily selected worst case SWR conditions  for each band.

I have an ALS-1306 solid state amplifier, and solid state devices do not like high SWR, so I decided that 1.7 to 1 was the worst case I wanted.  I then took whatever the bandwidth was between the low 1.7 to 1, and the high 1.7 to 1 SWR points on each band, 80 through 10, and subtracted the high frequency from the low frequency, that gave me my available bandwidth for every band.  After dividing the bandwidth in half, and adding it to the low end of each band, I had the location I needed to place the low point for SWR for each band.  I ended up with the numbers below:

  • 80 Meters:  3.910 MHz.
  • 40 Meters:  7.133 MHz.
  • 30 Meters: 10.122 MHz
  • 20 Meters: 14.000 MHz.
  • 15 Meters: 21.085 MHz.
  • 10 Meters: 28.400 MHz.

This would give me between 2.00, to 1.7 to 1 SWR at the bottom of each band.  The upper end was left to fall wherever it ended up, in most cases the top end fell past the high end of each ham band.  80 Meters is the only exception, and is treated as a special case.  You will find below the final values for all ham bands, and in most cases the starting point.  Once we hit 15 Meters, the bandwidth is so wide as to cover the entire band, plus a wide margin, so that data is not included.  If you are interested in that data, please feel free to email me, I will send you the raw data files.

Below you will see six images, one for each band, 80, 40, 30, 20, 15, and 10 Meters.  Each image consists of four graphs, from top to bottom the graphs represent the following, SWR as viewed at the feedpoint, R, X, and Z, as viewed from the feedpoint, SWR as viewed from the shack, and R, X, and Z as viewed at the shack.  You can click a graph to get an expanded view, click the expanded view and you will get an even larger view.

Information on additional radials:

I took a set of scans of the SWR of the antenna using 8 radials, and then again using 20 radials.  The result was that for the most part as radials are added the resonant freqiency shifts upwards slightly.  The recieved signal levels however increased dramaticly…  On average most signals were around S4 to S5 in the FT8 sub-band.  As redials were added, I noted an increase in overall levels of around 3 to 3 S units on the K3.  The S readings were taken over a few days time, then averaged out to get to that number.  Here are the SWR grapsh of the same antenna, in the same place, with the same ground conditions, (no rain), as the radial count went from 8 to 20 radials.

Click a graph for an expanded view

80 Meters with 8 radials, 60 KHz bandwidth.

80 Meters with 8 radials, 60 KHz bandwidth.

80 Meters with 20 radials, 63 KHz bandwidth.

80 Meters with 20 radials, 63 KHz bandwidth, and lower SWR.

One must remember in this scenario, that a 1:1 SWR on a vertical guarantees it is not set up correctly.  A perfect vertical, in a perfect environment will have around 36 ohms, and show a 1.4:1 SWR.  Rather than try and explain why, see this very extensive article on the subject.

Other graphic information on the 6BTV:

Click a graph for an expanded view

80 Meter Overview

80 Meter Overview

40 Meter Overview

40 Meter Overview

30 Meter Overview

30 Meter Overview










20 Meter Overview

20 Meter Overview

15 Meter Overview

15 Meter Overview

10 Meter Overview

10 Meter Overview














Several people have asked what happens as radials are added…  I dug out my old antenna files from the Rig Expert Analyser.  It turns out I captured the antenna data as I added radials.  So, that said, here are the graphs for SWR going from 8 radials, to 24 radials.  All measurements were taken using a RigExpert, AA-54 analyzer.  I am finishing up a review of the AA-54 and expect to have it up on site within a few weeks.  I am most impressed with this device, it is a real instrument, and makes antenna work fun!  Please feel free to comment on the installation here, as I am seeking all input, positive or negative…


40 Meters, 8 radials

40 Meters, 8 radials



40 Meters, 16 radials

40 Meters, 16 radials



40 Meters, 24 radials

40 Meters, 24 radials

Click on any image above to expand.

19 Responses to Notes on tuning a Hustler 6BTV

  1. Wendy

    Doug I live in fl too. I needed a minimum of 4 radials at a length of 20 ft each. Without them the 5btv is unusable. Wendy

  2. Joseph Griffin

    You have some broken links to your plots. Great read. I will be referring to it when I put my 6BTV up.


  3. Dave

    One of the best descriptions of how a vertical works, I have seen… Thanks for posting it!

  4. Dave

    Hi Don,
    I use that area for antenna testing, and have several antenna mount points installed. That is what the additional posts and wire runs are for.

  5. Don

    I must be missing something – why did you need to dig six post holes to mount one antenna?

  6. Kenneth Lynch Sr.

    thanks ihave a alinco dx -sr 8t , antenna a hustler 6btv vertical antenna 80 meter vertinal antenna thanks . almost ready to put myham radio and antenna up thanks to all ken .

  7. Ray Benedict

    End fed monopole verticals will work without radials, however the efficiency will be about 15%. As illustrated in the ARRL antenna book, an antenna can be thought of as a capacitor with a series resistor. Displacement currents that form the electromagnetic field flow between the plates. One plate of the capacitor is the vertical radiator and ground is the other plate. Since even good ground is a poor conductor it has high loss, hence the resistor that represents the loss. The purpose of the radials is to put a low value resistor in parallel with the ground loss resistor to reduce the loss. And the value of two resistors in parallel is?
    As radials are added, the feed point resistance decreases until it reaches the theoretical 37 ohms. So the SWR goes up as radials are added. The best SWR of a 1/4 wave vertical without matching is about 1.2

  8. Kenneth Lynch Sr.

    i have a alinco 160 / 10 ham radio also i have a hustler 6 btv 80 meter vertical antenna no tadials works very goo and clear.

  9. Dave

    You may have adjusted the trap too far… I had something like that happen when I adjusted the 30 meter trap beyond where it was designed to be.

  10. Mark Hindman

    Im having a problem with 40 meters. Good radial field, all bands except 40 are in the center of where I want it, but the center frequency on 40 is 6.98. Tested using an AA-600. I’ve adjusted the traps, and the top section is against the 30 meter trap. 🙁

  11. Anonymous

    Antenna input impedance is not an indication of efficiency. There use to be a chart in the ARRL antenna book that showed efficiency vs number of radials. ARRL recommends 16 radials for decent efficiency although broadcasters use 120 for 95% theoretical efficiency.
    For 30 radials length can be 0.15 wavelength.

  12. Anonymous

    Start your tuning on 10 Meters, and work up in frequency…

  13. Anonymous

    What IS THE SWR on each band?

  14. KB5XN James

    An excellent article Dave, I’ve been running a Butternut Vertical for about the past thirty years or so. Mine started out as a two band unit and I converted it to 6 band use. It has been an outstanding performer for me. I recently moved it to a different location here at the QTH and installed a new radial field in the process. I used an AEA 121 for setting each band. I wish I had read your article before redoing everything. I ended up much as you did but with considerably more effort. Thanks for posting all this good information.

  15. Donald

    Gene, you could put an ad in your local Craigslist that you need help setting your vertical up. But I do believe if you follow the directions and are not in a hurry you should be able to figure it out. Just try tuning it for the lowest band first and see what your analyzer shows. Then try transmitting a low power signal through an SWR meter and take data points along the lowest band, which I believe is 80 meters on your antenna. If your lowest SWR is out of the band you need to make further adjustments. Adjustments on different bands will affect other bands, so you follow the tuning process per the directions to minimize this. Adjustments on a band should move the bottom of the SWR curve up or down. You move it to where you plan to work in those bands, continue with the adjustments, and keep doing that until you have every band’s low SWR where you want. A trap dipole or vertical is a compromise antenna that is shorter than a full length antenna.

    It is possible that your MFJ antenna analyzer is not working correctly. I’ve read that the model you have is not easy to work with. If you have money to spend the MFJ-223 may be much easier to work with since it has a graphical display, which shows at a glance many data points on a graph-like scale on the LCD readout. I picked up a uses AEA HF Analyst SWR-121 for $30 at the Hamvention (biggest hamfest in the world!) in May of this year and it made quick work of tuning my mobile antenna whip antennas.I could see quickly where the SWR dip was and knew to make it shorter to go up in frequency and longer to go down.

    By now you have probably gotten on the air, but consider, if you have the space, either a fan dipole for multiband use, or a doublet, which is not resonant on any band and is fed with 450 or 600 ohm ladder line to a tuner, then to your rig. (You can use a window pass-through panel to get the open wire line or coaxial cables to other antennas into the house or shack.)

    A 102 foot doublet, fed in the middle with open wire line (or window line, which is similar), should tune on any band above 3.5 MHz through 30 MHz and possibly 6 meters (50-54 MHz) also. Other lengths work well also but this is actually the length of an MFJ antenna that comes with everything you need if you don’t want to build it yourself.

    A fan dipole is simply multiple dipoles fed at the same point. They’re more complicated than a doublet but you tune each band separately and there is very little interaction. I think 5 or 6 bands is a practical limit but one cut for 40M will work on 15M, so you get a band “for free” on the 40M dipole.


  16. kg3v

    Thanks very much for all of this great information on cleaning up a 6BTV antenna. I have had one on my pier over the Chesapeake Bay and it recently took a pretty nasty storm. Time to tear it down and clean it up. I was not sure where to start until I read your article. Appreciate all the great reference Links too. I will summarize my results on my Ham Blog ( and will Link to your article.

    73, Tom KG3V

  17. Doug

    Sorry about the fat finger/spell check typos. W4DBL.

  18. Doug

    Well done. I have a 6BTV and have never been able to get a good SWR on most bands. Like you, I got the tilt base and a few other DXE pieces. My real issue is the old adage: “Location, Location, Location “. The plan was to operate this as a no radial Verticle. No plan survives call ntact with the enemy and this one is no exception. The area there I had to locate the mount is in a strip on lane along the back of the lot. About 8×30’. To the rear is a ~45 degree slope to a drainage ditch. This area is not accessible for radials. The other three sides innclude a wall, solid paved area and the end of the lot.

    My initial install was a post driven in about out 4 feet with 18 inches above ground. This gave me the scattered SWRs. My measurements were done with an AA-600.

    My conclusion after many sweaty hours, was the low conductivity of the FL sand made this one almost unusable without a basic radial field.

    When you add the tuning issues to the HOA was issues, I pulled the antenna back into the garage and went to plan B.

    Plan B is a Ciro Mazzoni Baby Loop with a Yaesu rotator.
    I’m working on an aluminum mount so I can easily pull the antenna during hurricane season as needed. This one has a 100 mph limit. But the real issue here is blowing and falling tree limbs. Easier to pull it as needed.

    If Plan B doesn’twork, then I’ll go back and tinker with the 6 BTV. If it does, I’ll still see if I can get it to work as a pure vertical.

    Will post once I make some progress.

    Since someone will ask about long wires and dipoles, the HOA and look t size pretty much eliminates those options.




  19. Gene Linder

    W5GNE, Magnolia, TX., I loved your detailed planning method and the way you presented your info.
    I am new to Ham (Tech Feb.,2018, General August, 2018). I setup a di-pole with an auto tuner with no problems. I picked up a 4-BTV and up graded to a 6-BTV 1/4 vertical a couple months ago. But, being new I have had a difficult time attempting to tune it. I have purchased all the DX upgrades (radial plate, quick tilt, Choke, 80 radials 32 ft each) and set it up. Its pretty but not tuned. Yea, I have all the DX Eng. manuals and have attempted to follow them. I have used a MFJ HF/VHF SWR Analyzer Model MFJ-259CM (new) but I think its an “operator error” issue. I sure wished you lived near me to help out. Most of the Ham guys in my NARS club have di-poles and do not understand a vertical.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.